Controversies
within the Republican Party in Washington and Augusta could
foreshadow an historic political change, perhaps resulting in the
creation of a major third party.
The
possibility arises because the most strictly conservative Republicans
are willing to confront members of their own party who are more
willing to compromise. While both sides are conservative, the
hardliners vehemently reject traditional political decision-making,
especially deals made across party line.
The
strict conservatives would even block government action if they
cannot gain complete acceptance of their own policies. And
embarrassing Democrats and opposing whatever they may propose, even
if acceptable to conservatives in substance, is a key element of
their strategy.
The
difficulties Republicans have had in choosing a new speaker of the
U.S. House of Representatives reflects the deep split between the
hardliners and the more traditional Republicans.
Much
the same seems to be true of the conflict between Gov. Paul LePage
and some of his fellow Republicans in the Maine Legislature.
Because
of their need to reach out to a diverse national electorate, both
major political parties should reflect a broad ideological range.
Democrats from West Virginia and California may disagree on many
issues, just as could Republicans from Maine and Alabama. But they
have usually agreed on enough to keep their parties reasonably
coherent and competitive.
Third
parties or independent presidential candidates are not unusual. They
may have enough appeal to erode the voting support of the major
parties. They range from the State Rights and Progressive parties in
1948 to the independent candidacy of H. Ross Perot in 1992.
But
such incursions in the two-party system have not produced a change in
the system itself. Their influence has been temporary, because they
did not bring about any change in the dominance of Congress by the
two major parties.
The
last time a new major party arose occurred when the Republican Party
was created in the 1850s out of a crumbling Whig Party. That began
the long period of control by the Republicans and Democrats.
Why
could the political situation now be ripe for the creation of a new
political party, able to challenge the two existing major parties?
The
right wing believes voters worry the country has moved too far toward
liberal positions ever since the administration of Franklin D.
Roosevelt in the 1930s and 40s. They see the possibility of gaining
majority support based on revolutionary era conservatism.
The
most obvious explanation is that strict conservatives believe they
can achieve control of the Republican agenda and either replace other
GOP officeholders or force them to align their views with the right
wing. They are ready to fight for control of the party.
To
achieve their goal, they insist on ideological purity. Beyond
completely opposing the Democrats, they also are willing to treat
other Republicans as the enemy and punish them.
Perhaps
the resulting chaos will force Republican voters to decide between
the two approaches offered by their elected leaders. But if that
proves to be impossible and they remain divided, the possibility of a
formal split emerges.
If
the strict conservatives take over the party, they could drive out
traditional Republicans. Some would become moderate or conservative
Democrats, but others might be tempted to build a new moderate party,
hoping to attract some Democrats.
If
the strict conservatives were defeated in the GOP, they could create
their own party, even if that brought on Democratic victories. Their
obstinacy would be meant to threaten their fellow Republicans that
unless they gave in, the Democrats would control for the long haul.
It
is likely that GOP leaders realize they are at this juncture. In
withdrawing from the election of House speaker, Rep. Kevin McCarthy
acknowledged he could not bridge the divide among his GOP colleagues.
That’s exactly why Speaker John Boehner said he would resign.
In
Maine, LePage asserts his right to control the GOP agenda and
override more moderate Republicans. The state party has a long
tradition of political moderation and progressive policies, notably
on environmental matters, but he does not accept it.
In
recent years, strict conservatives, who seem to participate in the
party’s operations more actively than other Republicans, have
sought to seize control of the state party. Their most well known
success came when LePage took over the Blaine House.
From
his governor’s chair, LePage seems determined to roll over fellow
Republicans and bring them into line behind his policies. Should he
succeed, a possibility not to be ignored, he would promote a party
split, made even more likely if the national GOP splinters.
No comments:
Post a Comment