Donald
Trump’s political rise was due partly to the widely held belief
that he is a multi-billionaire whose wealth comes from his business
skill.
If
he could become a billionaire as a tough negotiator in real estate
deals, he could be the kind of strong and successful leader the U.S.
needs.
Supporting
his reputation, he projected the greatest self-confidence about his
ability to solve problems and lead the country just as he had led his
vast network of companies. He proudly splashed his name on his
enterprises, thanks to his reputation as a businessman and television
celebrity.
Trump
claims to be worth $10 billion dollars, placing him among a handful
of the wealthiest people in the world. Forbes magazine, which
independently rates the rich, says he’s worth $4.5 billion.
But
neither Forbes nor anybody else really knows, because most of his
investments are in private deals, not in corporations required to
publish financial reports. Still, Trump insists people should be
impressed by his wealth and even once sued a writer who said he was a
mere “millionaire.”
Why
is the amount of Trump’s wealth subject to so much doubt?
Anybody
is free to set a value on his or her assets and Trump seems to say he
has done that to come up with $10 billion. His holdings are worth
that amount – in his opinion. But when a bank is asked to accept
the property as security for a loan, it may find it has a lesser
value.
Here’s
how it could work. Whatever the value of a parcel of land, it might
gain in value if you could get the necessary permits to build a
skyscraper on it. You value your own property on the assumption that
you will get the permits.
In
the case of New York hotels, it worked. He might control the land,
but need permits and want tax breaks. Thanks to his father’s
ability to call in favors for having made political contributions, he
received them.
Trump
and his many companies own real estate in partnership with others,
who control most of the property. But he may attach value to it
beyond the scope of his investment on the strength of his name being
the building’s “brand” and his company having management
responsibility.
“I
am the king of debt,” Trump has said. He uses borrowed money to
cover his share of investments as much as he can. This at least
raises the question if he distinguishes between gross investment and
net value.
A
piece of property has value, perhaps equal to its cost or to what it
might get, if sold. That would be its gross value. Its value at any
moment is that gross value less the amount of money borrowed to
purchase it and not yet repaid. That would be the asset value of
Trump’s share of a building.
If
he sets his wealth based on the gross value, without taking into
account his debt, his assets would be inflated. Only when he makes
debt payments, would his assets grow.
If
he does not make debt payments, his companies may seek bankruptcy
protection from making further payments and the property passes to
the lender. Trump companies have been involved in at least four
bankruptcies to shed financial responsibilities.
The
exact amount of debt existing behind his investments remains unknown,
but the New York Times recently dug up at least $650 million in debt
on his U.S. investments. The more he and his companies owe, the less
wealthy he is.
Trump
has thus far refused to disclose his tax returns. While they would
not necessarily expose his net worth, they could provide important
clues to his wealth.
Even
if they showed he legally paid little tax, which he suggests is the
case, he would have revealed his gross income and the allowances he
used to reduce it for tax purposes. For example, losses in some
activities could be used to offset gains in others, this reducing his
tax liability.
Using
Forbes’ estimate, his annual income would be $45 million assuming
he gained only one percent on his investments. Perhaps he lost more
than he profited, thus paying little or no taxes. So his tax returns
matter, especially in light of his claims of business success.
Trump’s
fame depends on beliefs about his great wealth and the skill and
intelligence that made it possible. If he has greatly exaggerated
his financial success as businessman, what might that say about his
possible political success as president?
No comments:
Post a Comment