On the day Donald Trump launched his
presidential campaign, he made dealing with Mexico the keystone of
his speech. From then on, he continually advocated keeping Mexicans
out of the U.S. and American jobs out of Mexico.
Candidates promise what voters want to
hear, although they may well know that keeping their promises will be
impossible. That makes them look like liars, inevitably
disappointing some of their supporters.
President Trump is about to discover
that the most he can do with any certainty is build a wall and even
that won't produce the desired result. He cannot make good on the
central promises on which he launched his campaign.
Some of Trump's backers feared the
country is being swamped by Latino immigrants. They were
enthusiastic about his proposal to build a wall, paid for by Mexico,
as a way of stopping the flow. He also promised massive deportations
of Mexicans.
Not that it matters. It's too late.
Even if another Latino never enters the country, there are now more
than 56.6 million Hispanics here – 17.6% of the population, growing
at a faster rate than the population as a whole. The goal of the
wall in keeping down their their numbers cannot be achieved.
What about deportation? Obama oversaw
the removal of 2.5 million illegal immigrants, the record for any
president. G.W. Bush had previously expelled more than 2 million.
Many deported were not even Mexican, who are only a part of the pool
of undocumented immigrants.
Continuing Bush-Obama policies can't
change the overall demographics much. And nobody can simply be
tossed out. Everybody, including illegal aliens, are entitled to due
process of law.
He may get the wall built, but Mexico
won't write a check to pay for it. Trump knows that and is thinking
of a tax. One possibility is a levy on funds transferred to Mexico,
targeting remittances by immigrants, legal or not.
A tax on funds leaving the country for
Mexico would have to apply to everyone, not only undocumented
Mexicans. That would amount to a tax increase on anybody doing
business with Mexico. Opposition to a higher tax could leave the
U.S. with a wall that it has paid for.
Of course, few people favor unlimited
illegal immigration. To really limit it, more border patrol guards
could be more effective than a wall, also cheaper and faster. But
that's not what was promised.
What about more protectionism by ending
the North American Free Trade Agreement, setting higher tariffs on
imports from Mexico and discouraging job growth by pressing American
firms not to invest there? The goal: keep jobs in the U.S. and
bring some home.
More jobs in Mexico cut down on the
incentive for Mexicans to move to the U.S. looking for work. And a
prosperous economy there helps provide a more solid and stable
neighbor.
Protectionism is the hallmark of
weakness. Can America no longer compete in the world? Trump
promises to “make America great again,” but boosting tariffs
could make the U.S. look weak, leading to a loss of respect and
influence. It's already happening.
Increasing U.S. protection against
imports from Mexico without any legitimate reason would allow Mexico
to raise its own tariffs on imports from the U.S. That would cost
American jobs, just the opposite of what Trump intends.
Without lower cost imports, prices will
increase in the U.S. In effect, a policy to increase American jobs
by displacing lower cost imports would amount to saying American
consumers have agreed to pay the added cost of keeping jobs here. Is
that what voters wanted last November?
Suppose an American automobile
manufacturer closes a plant there and shifts production to the U.S.
Mexico might use the abandoned plant to produce cars for Mexicans and
the rest of Latin America, costing the American manufacturer a
market.
Meanwhile, technology, a major cause of
lost manufacturing jobs, will be a factor in the car production
brought back home. The car company will automate, trying to keep
labor costs down.
Because of Trump's inevitable inability
to keep his campaign promises on dealing with Mexico, some of his
supporters are sure to be disappointed, even disaffected. That, too,
is inevitable, and it could happen again and again.
Instead of confrontation with Mexico
that sounds better than it is, and is sure to fail, how about “The
Art of the Deal,” in which Trump claims to excel?
Otherwise, the passage from Trump Tower
to Trump power may prove to be a great disappointment to many of the
people who put him in office.
No comments:
Post a Comment