Gordon L. Weil
The biggest problem with combating
Covid-19 is not the struggle of science to come up with an answer.
It's politics.
The coronavirus is now the center of a
war by the ideological right, led by the Republican Party, and
against efforts, led by many governors of both parties, to let
science set the pace of recovery.
The anti-protection forces are composed
of three elements, whose apparent purpose is to support reopening the
economy, even if that means sweeping aside measures that have worked
in limiting the spread of Covid-19.
First, there are believers that
personal freedom beats any common interest. They see government
action to shut businesses, limit free movement and mandate wearing
face coverings as illegal invasions of what should be their
unfettered rights.
Second are right-wing opponents of
issues from gun control to immigration who seek to exploit an
opportunity to strengthen their movements. They may be able to tap
into new pools of people who could share their views. And current
Covid-19 policies, like shutting down immigration, might help their
cause later.
When the list of “essential”
businesses that could avoid a shutdown was published, the gun lobby
noted the lack of gun shops. After it was belatedly added to the
federal list, Maine GOP
legislative leaders asked Gov. Mills to do the same. She
did.
Third are Trump Republicans, who oppose
governors undertaking necessary but unpopular measures, as a way of
rebuilding support for President Trump and other Republicans. By
making reopening their cause, they hope the economy kicks back into
high gear, an essential element of the Trump campaign and helpful to
Republicans riding his coattails.
Now Maine Republican leaders want the
Legislature to come back and strip Mills of the emergency
powers they joined in giving her by voice vote when they
left Augusta. Their claim, refuted by the governor, is that she did
not consult them sufficiently.
They did not attempt to create a
bipartisan group, but made the appeal purely partisan. They
apparently figure that opposition to the stay-at-home, wear-a-mask
rules will grow to a point that Mainers would line up with the GOP in
favor of reopening and re-elect Susan Collins and even Trump.
With their emphasis on economic values
over health risks, some opposition groups either inaccurately assert
that the overall death rate has not increased or argue that added
Covid deaths are the reasonable price for people getting back to
work. At the same time as the Trump administration pushes reopening,
it openly recognizes there will be a major
increase in cases and deaths.
Many governors, ranging from Janet
Mills in Maine to Jay Inslee in Washington, emphasize the health of
their citizens and follow the warnings of science about the risks
arising from an unknown and deadly illness. Their states have
produced better health results than others that are more politicized.
Their opponents want to exploit
unhappiness with their tough measures. Opposition is also based on a
desire to distract attention from the failure of the federal
government and some states to be prepared for the crisis or to react
to it in a timely and appropriate manner.
The federal government should have been
better prepared. Its reserve of medical supplies was supposed to be
sufficient to meet emergency national needs. A presidential
administration in office for three years cannot blame earlier
presidents when it has done nothing, even after having been warned.
Instead, it simply changed the role of
the national reserve by stating it was meant only as a backup to the
states. The market power of the federal government in buying needed
medical supplies was lost, forcing states to compete with one another
and other countries with poor results.
In 1951, the Epidemic
Intelligence Service was created. It is composed of
thousands of trained medical personnel who know a lot about handling
a crisis such as the U.S. now faces. It includes “disease
detectives.”
Its policies suggest that there should
be a single, reliable spokesperson. That person, who must convey bad
news and tough rules, should be a scientist, not a politician. By
having a single spokesperson, the message can be conveyed clearly.
And this person should always show compassion and sympathy.
Maine does well in following E.I.S.
practices. Dr. Nirav Shah, the state CDC director, is the
spokesperson. Mills does not offer medical opinions but explains
what she is doing, using the powers given her by the Legislature.
While Shah appears daily, she does not.
Contrast Maine with the daily federal
briefing, usually dominated by Trump. There are several
spokespersons and they contradict one another. At first, Trump
downplayed the threat, hoping, using his word, that he could be the
“cheerleader” for an early recovery, helpful to his reelection.
He displays ignorance of science and research. Politics matter more
than health.
Covid-19 can be brought under control,
even without a universally effective medicine or a vaccine, by
limiting the spread so that its dwindles. That can be done by
everyone wearing a face covering. But it takes time, full
participation and keeping the effort out of politics for that to
work.
Politically, it takes some courage to
require compliance. It is more appealing to favor unfettered
freedom.
The opponents of fighting the spread
have raised the issue. By advocating rapid reopening, they have also
raised the stakes. In the end, it's up to each person to decide.
No comments:
Post a Comment