The
white nationalist rally in Charlottesville, Va. provides strong
evidence of the widening division in American politics.
President
Trump’s reaction shows a new stage in the rightward evolution of
the Republican Party, one rejected by many GOP leaders.
He
would not single out the far right demonstrators for responsibility,
even after one of them had killed a woman. Two days later, he read a
prepared statement criticizing white supremacists, only to revert to
assigning equal blame to racists and their angry opponents.
The
GOP has evolved from Lincoln’s war to defeat slave state rebellion
to a party led by a president giving comfort to racism. After the
Civil War, the GOP became the dominant party. Its platform favored
business, while keeping government small and workers under control.
The
Great Depression of 1929, the deepest economic crash, revealed the
limits of Republican policy. With Franklin D. Roosevelt’s New Deal
and a larger role for government, it lost its dominance.
Sen.
Susan Collins remains loyal to many of the values of the traditional,
pro-business Republican Party, while accepting the need for change.
In her views, voters can see a mix of conservatism and practical
concern for the less fortunate.
But
the party came under the influence of leaders exploiting social
issues and opposition to gun control. Under President Ronald Reagan,
the party moved to the right. The 1994 congressional elections
brought a disciplined and strongly conservative GOP to power in
Congress.
The
GOP has been tightening its grip on power through the successful use
of tactics designed to suppress Democratic voting. Traditional
Republicans have been increasingly challenged by strong
conservatives, some of them participants in the Tea Party movement,
and the elected face of the party became more conservative.
Social
conservatives, most of whom would pare government back to little more
than national defense, came to dominate the GOP. To them, Collins,
though a lifelong party member, is seen as a Rino – a Republican in
name only. They now own the brand name, not her,
Trump’s
election represented the next step in the rightward evolution of the
party. His anti-Mexican, anti-Muslim, anti-“politically correct”
rhetoric made some on the far right, who had remained outside the
world of politics, believe they now had a one of their own as
president.
They
suddenly feel free to express and act on their views. Believing them
part of his political “base,” Trump seems reluctant to reject
their overt and extreme racism. Hence, the Charlottesville rally and
Trump’s reaction, applauded by right-wingers promoting white
supremacy.
The
reaction of elected Republican conservatives suggests that, while the
party may have shifted to the right and chosen to emphasize wedge
social issues, the party is not ready to embrace racist elements even
for their votes.
Still,
today’s Republican Party is deeply conservative on a broad range of
issues. Because its electoral success appears to be based on a
combination of traditional GOP support and the newly self-confident
hard right, it is reluctant to compromise with Democrats.
The
Democrats run the risk of insisting on a similar degree of strict
adherence to a set of principles enforced by real party discipline.
Supporters
of Sen. Bernie Sanders may legitimately feel their man would have won
the presidential election if he had overcome the Clinton forces
control of the Democratic Party. The party had not been neutral and
had lost. Now, some Bernie activists want to purge the party’s
traditional supporters, whom they see as discredited.
A
key to the Democrats’ historic strength has been its openness to a
wide range of views. Roosevelt transformed his party’s traditional
reliance on the South into a broad coalition including northern
liberals. Eventually that combination would break apart after
southern conservatives moved to the GOP.
The
2018 congressional elections will be a test to see if conservative
Republicanism, in which Trump welcomes extremists, will be sustained
or rejected. But the Democrats must do more than merely stand by the
pick up the pieces.
The
2020 presidential election may show if progressive Democrats accept
the need for a “big umbrella” more than the creation of an
uncompromising, ideologically pure party. It may also reveal if the
GOP recovers its traditional conservatism or continues its drift to
the hard right.
For
many people, what is of greatest importance is not the triumph of a
party or a political philosophy, no matter how correct it may seem,
but whether the political divide has become impossible to close,
making compromise impossible.
The
survival of the American system of government, operating in a vast
and diverse country, depends on compromise.
No comments:
Post a Comment