Gordon L. Weil
When gentleman bank robber Willie
Sutton was asked why he robbed banks, it was claimed, though falsely,
that he answered, “Because that's where the money is.”
If you could ask Covid-19 why it goes
after so many people in senior residential centers, it would have to
answer, “Because that's where the old people are.”
For whatever reason, Sutton liked
robbing banks. If Covid-19 could set its own priorities, it would
admit that it attacks seniors because they are the most vulnerable,
making it easier to do its deadly job.
As people age, their immune systems,
the body's mechanisms for fighting off invading illnesses, grow
weaker.
https://www.livescience.com/35908-aging-lowers-your-immunity.html
It's natural. As they age, it is also likely that people have
suffered from illnesses that have weakened their defenses, even if
they seem to have survived in good health.
That's why the dosage of the annual flu
vaccine is stronger for older people. It helps them fight off the
virus despite the loss of some of their own immunity.
Many seniors live in retirement
communities. Some cannot live on their own, because their health
requires them to have access to care, sometimes from qualified
professionals.
At one end of the spectrum of care are
skilled nursing facilities and hospices. Because government health
insurance may pay most of their cost, federal and state agencies
impose standards of staffing and conditions on them.
But other communities may involve only
the shared use of facilities, ranging from dining, to amusements, to
exercise. These senior residence arrangements are lightly regulated,
but are left to the market to determine costs and conditions.
Senior communities are growing as the
number of seniors grows. In 2000, people over 65 were 12.4 percent
of the American population. By 2030, they are expected to be 20.6
percent.
https://www.statista.com/statistics/457822/share-of-old-age-population-in-the-total-us-population/
In other words, one person out of every five in this country will be
a senior.
It is also possible that more seniors
will be retired. While the recent trend has been for people to work
until an older age, they may find it increasingly difficult to find
jobs as the economy slowly recovers.
Seniors have been advised, where
possible, to delay the start of receiving Social Security to maximize
income. But, in the past few weeks, advice has begun to appear
suggesting taking the federal payments earlier to be assured of some
income when jobs are slow to come back.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/personal-finance/should-you-take-social-security-early-for-some-coronavirus-changes-the-math-on-waiting-until-youre-70/2020/04/10/e85486a8-7a6e-11ea-b6ff-597f170df8f8_story.html
Similarly, more seniors may turn to
residential housing facilities because they are less costly than
maintaining a home of one's own.
While it is known that seniors are far
more likely to die from Covid-19 than the general population,
insufficient data is available on the effect of the virus. Maine
reveals only that more than half the cases are over the age of 50.
https://bangordailynews.com/2020/04/20/news/state/another-mainer-dies-as-coronavirus-cases-hit-875-statewide/
That both confirms what we already know about reduced immunity and
hides much relevant information about how serious the problem may be.
Across the country state agencies are reporting that, at some
congregate care locations, Covid-19 has spread rapidly and, in some
places, has caused a spike in deaths. Evidence mounts that
regulation has been inadequate either in toughness, inspections or
both.
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/04/19/nyregion/coronavirus-nj-andover-nursing-home-deaths.html?campaign_id=2&emc=edit_th_200420&instance_id=17772&nl=todaysheadlines®i_id=267859&segment_id=25542&user_id=dad4e9655de8f76c4cb3f9003974adeb
Some advocates of ending protective
action appear to believe seniors are expendable. They accept the
possibility of increased deaths as the price of opening the economy.
Short of such indifference to seniors,
the solution might turn out to be a segregated society. Young people
will go back to work, confident that, even if they contract Covid-19,
they will survive. If older people need protection, they might find
themselves unable to return to a normal life style.
For seniors, opening the country may
mean closing it for them. Unless medical science produces a vaccine
or medication that protects them, they may shelter in place for the
long haul.
Unless government shares this kind of
indifference to the problems facing seniors, it needs to take action.
Protecting public health will have to
mean standards about conditions, staffing and emergency equipment
that are applied not only to care facilities now subject to
regulation, but to any congregate facilities for seniors.
Seniors should have a reasonable
expectation that residential communities are taking steps to protect
them from threats to which their immune systems can no longer
respond.
While they do not all serve as health
care facilities, they all offer special living arrangements for
seniors. Just as they must meet higher fire protection standards,
they should be required to meet certain health protection standards.
That also means more and better
inspection both of facilities now subject to regulation and others to
be added. Stronger sanctions are needed. If a senior residence
falls below standards, government should have the tools to force it
into compliance.
For Maine, this is both a special
responsibility and an opportunity. With the oldest average
population, the state needs to sharpen its focus on the well-being of
the elderly. The first step would be greater transparency about the
Covid-19 impact on seniors. Hiding behind patient confidentiality is
unconvincing.
Beyond doing a better job of focusing
on seniors, Maine could build its special role as a welcoming home
for retirees. Even now, it is an obvious magnet for seniors. By
strengthening its policies, it could boost its retirement role as an
element of its economic growth.
No comments:
Post a Comment