Gordon L. Weil
Americans like to believe we all unite
to fight an external threat.
But it's not true in the COVID-19
crisis.
Start with the inexplicable absence of
toilet paper in the supermarket. Because almost all of it is
manufactured in the U.S., there's no shortage. But the shelves were
swept clear of it.
That's hoarding. By buying far more
than you need, so you will have more of a product much later, you
deprive a neighbor who needs some now. Supermarkets have imposed
rationing.
Some suppliers, even of medical
supplies, engage in price gouging.
Or what about young people who crowded
together in Spring break revelry? They mistakenly believed either
they wouldn't get COVID-19 or their case would be mild. They have
shown no concern for older and vulnerable people who may pick up the
virus from them with dire consequences.
What about the mindless naysayers?
They remind us that many people die from automobile accidents or the
annual flu, so we should not get upset about COVID-19, which has
until now claimed many fewer victims, though there is no known limit
to the losses. Don't worry about its deaths.
There are good people. Bad behavior
should not obscure the selfless acts by many people to help others.
Health care providers accept enormous personal risk in
around-the-clock battles to save lives. Many people shop for the
elderly and check on the condition of the most vulnerable. That's
the spirit needed in this situation.
In a crisis of this scale, the people
turn to their governments. The time comes when elected leaders must
step beyond everyday partisan politics to provide not only material
leadership but encouragement and hope for all.
Not this time. Perhaps for the first
time in memory, leadership that rallies all people has been absent.
Takes the CARES Act, the $2 trillion
piece of federal legislation that is designed to rescue workers,
companies and the economy from the threat of a major recession.
Except for one member of Congress, it was passed unanimously by both
houses.
CARES is basically a big government spending bill, the necessary
bookend to the Federal Reserve's action to cut interest rates. The
GOP had to go along with the essentially Democratic concept, because
the economy demanded government support. Some Republicans disliked
expanding the national debt by big outlays, but had no choice.
The bill was negotiated by Treasury
Secretary Steve Mnuchin, on behalf of President Trump, and Senate
Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, on behalf of the Democrats. Each side
had to make unpleasant sacrifices to strike the necessary deal. If
you want bipartisanship, this is what it looks like.
But when the bill, fully supported by
both parties, was signed by the president, the only people
surrounding him were Republicans. That amounts to trying to steal
the credit for the compromise. Americans united to meet a national
challenge? Hardly.
If there's one thing the former reality
show host knows, it's how to steal scenes. His daily media
briefings, even when he reads dryly from a prepared script, give him
good television ratings, which he brags about. He wants to be seen
as supreme crisis manager to boost his re-election campaign.
The Democrats allow a partisan Trump to
dominate the media. If Joe Biden expects to be the Democratic
candidate, where is he now? Or former President Obama, who could
call for public action in response to the virus. Are Mike
Bloomberg's billions only for his political campaign or could he
help? At least Speaker Pelosi has reached out publicly.
Replacing the silent Democrats, New
York Gov. Andrew Cuomo, not an immensely popular leader but one whose
state is the hardest hit, holds an excellent daily briefing, which
receives national coverage. Increasingly, he looks like the kind of
competent, strong-willed person who could be the candidate called for
by the times.
Aside from the domestic situation, it
is evident that, without the U.S. as the leader of the world's
response to COVID-19, there is no available alternative. But
Secretary of State Pompeo spurned cooperation with what used to be
America's closest allies, because he insisted they must agree to name
the virus after China.
The result is that not only do the
president and his aides fail to lead a unified America, but the U.S.
fails to lead a unified international response.
The coronavirus and its effect on the
economy are a costly tragedy. But so is the failure of the federal
government to rally the American public and lead the world.
No comments:
Post a Comment