Gordon L. Weil
I am the state. In
the original, it was “l’Ētat, c’est moi” and is attributed to Louis XIV, the
king of France centuries ago.
It could be the motto of Donald Trump, the most personal
president in American history. He uses the office, a public trust, as his personal
property. He rules more than he governs.
Elon Musk provides the latest proof of Trump’s personal
rule. The world’s richest man poured
hundreds of millions into the Trump campaign, and he helped the president
fulfill his promise to cut government spending.
The job was left to Musk, who slashed and burned his way through agency
after agency.
He departed the Trump administration with the appreciation
of the president ringing in his ears, but immediately savagely attacked Trump’s
pet legislation, because it boosts the federal debt, contrary to what Musk thought
he had been asked to do.
Trump vented his anger with Musk for opposing his “Big, Beautiful
Bill” by immediately threatening to end contracts of Musk’s companies with the
federal government, some providing important services.
Trump claims that he pushed Musk out of the government. If so, his action echoes the classic words of Frederick
the Great, the powerful king of Prussia.
When he tossed out Voltaire, his philosopher in residence, he said, “When
you have squeezed the juice from an orange, you throw away the peel.”
The personalization of the presidency by Trump is the
hallmark of his second term. Believing
that his second election was a vindication giving him almost royal authority,
he is open about his use and abuse of power.
He has tried to retaliate against law firms whose partners
have represented Democrats or others who have opposed him by undermining their ability
to do business with the government. They
can get off the hook by providing his personal projects, like his library, with
millions of dollars of free legal work.
He fired competent top military personnel without giving any
reason. Perhaps he concluded that a
Black general and a female admiral got their jobs thanks to Biden’s DEI without
regard to their merit. His passion to
purge what he sees as “woke” appointments is arbitrary and unchecked.
Because he believes that Biden became president thanks to a
stolen election, a belief unsupported by any evidence, he does all he can to
denigrate Biden’s presidency and make it seem like a terrible mistake. His call for an investigation of Biden’s
mental acuity during his presidency is unprecedented, but part of his effort to
discredit his predecessor.
Even his tariff policy reflects his temperament rather than
carefully planning. Presidents may be
able to use tariffs to deal with specific countries about specific items in
trade. But they are not supposed to use
emergency powers to extend a flat tariff to virtually every country, with the
notable exception of Russia, because he dislikes the U.S. trade deficit.
And what’s the basis of a 10 percent tariff? It has less to do with each country’s trade
imbalance with the U.S., if any, than with the fingers on his hands. And why should tariffs be doubled without any
economic justification from one day to the next when Trump is peeved at a
country? This is personal and not serious
trade policy.
Then, there’s the presidential plane. Believing he should have the world’s best
executive aircraft and tired of waiting for Boeing, he induced Qatar to give
the U.S. a luxury plane it had been unable to sell. It will cost taxpayers millions to make the plane
secure and suitable.
Somehow, his presidential library is supposed to get the
aircraft at the end of his term. His
promise not to use it then is both hollow and unenforceable.
This list skips over his family business dealings with Qatar
and other countries that are making him wealthier every day. And the sales of his crypto coins. No previous president has ever engaged in private
enterprises operating while he is in office and in countries dealing officially
with him. These are the ultimate examples
of the personal presidency. Except one.
The parade. Tens of millions of tax dollars are being spent for
a huge military review on June 14, his birthday. Such armed pomp is unusual for the U.S., but more
typical of Russia, China and a few kingdoms.
He wants to keep up with the neighbors, basking in the same glory as his
supposed pals Valdimir Putin and Xi Jinping.
The Constitution alone cannot stop him. It was drafted in the belief that America
would always reject one-person rule, just as did King George III. It may not now be fully up to Trump’s challenge.
Until now, Congress and the voters have tolerated this new view
of the presidency. The Supreme Court
encourages it. There is no substantial
opposition to it.
Where are we headed?
