Imagine
you are the commanding general of your nation’s armed forces and
head the national government.
You
decide that another country is getting “cute” and is harming your
country. The only way to take on that country is to declare world
war, even though your closest allies will be hit far harder than your
intended target.
So
you suddenly declare war, proclaiming that wars like this are “easy
to win.” While there are always dead and wounded on both sides in
any war, you think the other side will surrender immediately, and
your country will suffer no casualties.
This
is not fiction. It happened last week when President Trump announced
high tariffs on imports of steel and aluminum. He ignored the
negative reactions of many other countries and congressional leaders
of his own party.
“Cut
off imports,” he tweeted. “When we are down $100 billion with a
certain country and they get cute, don’t trade any more. We win
big. It’s easy.”
Trump
attended Wharton, a top university for economic studies, but he must
have missed a few classes. He failed to learn that if the U.S. cuts
off some imports from another country, that country can retaliate by
cutting imports of at least equal value from the U.S.
The
country Trump wanted to hit was China. The country Trump did hit was
Canada, the leading foreign supplier of steel. China doesn’t even
make the top ten suppliers
Even
worse, Trump justified the tariff hike on national security grounds,
finding that steel was crucial to defense and the country could not
become dependent on foreign suppliers, which account for about
one-third of steel used in the U.S. Of the top four domestic steel
producers, two are foreign owned.
Canada
shares defense of the North American airspace with the U.S. and is
one of the most trusted U.S. allies. It has fought at the side of
the U.S. in major wars. It is hardly a security threat.
When
Trump learned of the impact on Canada, his administration said the
U.S. would temporarily suspend the tariff increase for Canada and
Mexico as a way of forcing them to come to an agreement in the NAFTA
negotiations.
In
those talks, Canada says the Americans have adopted a
my-way-or-the-highway approach. In short, only if Canada does what
the U.S. wants can it avoid the steel tariffs. In war, that’s
called unconditional surrender. But this isn’t really war, so it
amounts to bullying your best friend.
Trump’s
policy would hurt his own people in two ways. First, Canada has
declared the tariff increases are “absolutely unacceptable” and
has said it would retaliate. It would identify important imports
from the U.S. and levy high tariffs on them to cut American sales.
Here’s
how that could hurt. Some 45.5 percent of Maine exports abroad go to
Canada. That amounts to about $1.2 billion in sales each year. If
Canada chooses to hit some items Maine exports, some Mainers could
lose their jobs.
Mainers
and workers elsewhere would be unemployed so that steelworkers could
keep their jobs. In effect, that’s a federal tax on Maine. But
it’s not the only one.
The
other effect on Americans will be higher retail prices. The reason
imports displace domestic production is that they are cheaper.
Everything made using imported steel costs less than it would if
manufacturers had to use domestic steel. When you buy a car, its
price will reflect higher cost steel.
Bath
Iron Works, one of the nation’s two builders of Navy destroyers,
will be forced to charge taxpayers more for the vessels. Even if BIW
has always used American steel, if Canadian competitors were driven
from the market, domestic prices might increase.
Trump
seems to believe that the U.S. should have a favorable trade balance
with every other country, even if that means higher prices for
American goods. He sees all trade relationships as a form of war,
which somehow the U.S. can easily win.
For
about a century, the world has come to understand that greater
efficiency and hence lower costs can come through international
trade. National economies have become tied together.
Trump
wants out of these relationships. The risk is that other countries
will take him seriously and replace American imports with those from
the rest of the world, especially China.
If
the criticism gets to Trump, leading him to soften his policy, he may
have learned the rest of Wharton’s lessons on trade.
Otherwise,
Trump’s economic policy can turn the United States, a continental
nation, into an island.
No comments:
Post a Comment