The country has found a politician who
is honest, speaking the truth as he sees it, no matter the
consequences. Paul LePage, the former Republican
governor of Maine, has spoken out against the proposal for popular
election of the president of the United States.
"It saddens me that we're willing
to take everything we stand for and throw it away," LePage said.
"It's only going to be the minorities who would elect."
He continued, "White people will not have anything to say."
Two of the last three presidents,
including Trump, won the electoral vote while losing the popular
vote. That has given a big push to the proposal of having presidents
elected by a majority of American voters.
LePage has said, "I was Donald
Trump before Donald Trump became popular." We are "one of
the same cloth," he said, inviting his listeners to accept him
as an authentic supporter of the president's views.
Unfortunately, the issue has become
partisan. Five times, the U.S. has elected a president supported by
only a minority of voters. All of the losers were Democrats. Not
surprisingly, the GOP opposes the national popular vote proposal.
Many Republicans seek to suppress the
influence of "minority" voters, allowing white voters to
continue to dominate the political process. Electoral voting goes
along with gerrymandering and measures making it more difficult to
register or vote.
These policies amount to a rearguard
action to slow the inevitability that the "minority" –
mainly African Americans, Hispanics, Asians and American Indians –
will soon constitute the majority of the population.
The proposal before Maine and the
country is that states will instruct their presidential electors to
vote for the candidate who has won the popular vote nationally. When
states with 270 electoral votes, a majority, support this approach,
it can come into effect. Right now, less than 100 more electoral
votes are needed.
One complaint about the proposal is
that Maine, a small state, will lose influence. The electoral vote
gives Maine 74/100 of one percent of national voting power. The
national popular vote, based on the 2016 election, would give Maine
56/100 of one percent. Maine's above-average voter turnout would
allow it to retain its modest influence.
We expect every voter to have equal
weight in the democratic process – one person, one vote. Without
the national popular vote, a Wyoming voter has almost four times the
influence of a California voter and counts somewhat more than a Maine
voter.
In both the 2000 and 2016 elections,
Maine voted with the popular majority only to see the loser in the
state gain the presidency. The same was true for California, New
York and other states, which could not have seemed fair to their
majorities. In Maine, despite LePage's worries, the majority was
obviously mostly white people.
In 1787, when the Constitution was
drafted, the Framers showed mistrust of democracy, which they limited
to the House of Representatives. States retained much power. Each
one, no matter its size, got three automatic seats in Congress –
two in the Senate and one in the House. The size of a state's
congressional delegation determines its electoral vote.
Since then, popular democracy has
risen. The Senate is elected by popular vote, not by state
legislatures as it was originally. Women, African Americans and
younger people have been added to the original corps of white men.
National media and a national economy have grown, engaging citizens
across the country.
Under the Constitution, each
presidential election is actually 51 separate elections – the 50
states and D.C. Maine, with its split electoral vote system, shows
that states can act independently in deciding how their electoral
votes will be determined. That is what is now happening.
Jurisdictions with a majority of
electoral votes can decide that the state will allocate its votes to
a national winner. There are now enough states that have seen their
majorities overruled by a popular minority to provide the necessary
270 votes to make the change. There's no need to amend the
Constitution.
Whatever Maine does, the national
popular vote is inevitable. Presidential campaigns are national,
ignoring state lines. Healthcare, federal taxes, immigration,
individual rights, and the economy are addressed nationally not
state-by-state by presidential candidates.
The Republican Party needs to extend
its appeal to a broader constituency rather then trying to suppress
the vote of non-white ethnic groups. It must see that its policies
to discourage voting by new participants in the political process are
not good for the party or for the country.
No comments:
Post a Comment