Yogi Berra was right that “it’s not over until it’s over,”
but still Clinton seems to be there and either Trump will be there or we will
see the most interesting political convention since the GOP in 1976.
Trump. His momentum
should get him enough convention delegates to avoid a convention war. If not, he will have enough disgruntled
supporters to devalue the nomination if it goes to somebody else.
He seems to sincerely believe that his style of campaigning
is what will have brought him the nomination, so he will stick with it. He can make this a campaign about women by continuing
to attack Clinton because she is “weak.”
Not really a disguised code word and one that should get women and
sympathetic men into action to support her.
Trump’s electoral problem is that he has attacked so many
constituencies that it is difficult to see how those who remain unscathed can
produce enough votes for him.
Clinton. Her problem
is her negative rating, though it’s not as bad as Trump’s. That may seem small comfort, but, after all,
an election is about comparisons between candidates. Her negatives will be affected by the Justice
Department decision on her use of the home computer, but otherwise, they will
probably fade somewhat.
She threads a fine line.
She cannot go as far as Sanders to the left, probably because she is
simply not that liberal. That’s why the
Republican business community, the backbone of the mainstream could grow to
like her. That explains the Koch
consideration she gets. It may not make
her more popular with Democrats, but what’s a better alternative?
Sanders. He is now
running to influence the Democratic platform, and he will. Clinton would be
wise to allow him his day. If he doesn’t
handle his opportunities carefully, he may have his activist organization after
the campaign, but he will quickly fade.
As for his platform strategy, if you tested Democratic
candidates for president and Congress on the content of the platform a month
after it was adopted, most would fail.
Candidates have their own platforms, and party platforms (maybe like
party organizations) mean little in practice.
The tone of the campaign.
Clinton is wise to appear “presidential” and willing to seek compromises. Leave the heated rhetoric to Trump. Americans do expect a certain amount of
decorum from their president. So Clinton
should remain calm.
Also, she might not greet every audience with her mouth
agape in feigned joy. I know, she’s
supposed to make you think she’s having a ball, just enjoying the dickens out
of the campaign. Recognizes friends in
the crowd as if she’s surprised they are there.
Such artificial happiness only promotes the idea that she is not honest. Nobody could enjoy campaigning that much.
Oh, BTW, it’s time for her to put together the proverbial
truth squad. Trump makes a fun target,
far more vulnerable than she is.
Too early to talk about running mates, but not too early to
think about it.
No comments:
Post a Comment