A national debate rages about the minimum wage.
One side argues the current federal minimum of $7.25 an hour
yields a family income below the poverty line.
On the other side, businesses argue they cannot afford to raise wages
without raising prices and losing sales.
Each side can find reputable economists to support its
position. However, it’s easy to conclude
that many economists make up their minds on the issue first and then develop
studies supporting their views.
All of this goes on in a charged political atmosphere. Democrats generally support increasing the
minimum wage, while Republicans usually oppose any increase.
The federal minimum was last set in 2009 and has not kept up
with even the relatively modest inflation since then. Traditionally, the federal rate has only been
revised when it had lost some of its purchasing power as the result of
inflation.
Attempts to raise the federal level have failed, because the
GOP has the votes to block any increase from passing Congress. President Obama has issued an executive order
raising the minimum to $10.10 for some federal contract workers. The Labor Department said the order could
affect hundreds of thousands of workers.
Many states set a minimum wage above the federal $7.25. Maine’s is $7.50, but, with a referendum
pending, it is likely to be raised. Impatient
with Washington inaction, some states have decided to phase in higher rates and
automatically link them to the rate to inflation. California just set its rate for 2022 at $15,
the highest in the country.
Most economists agree on at least some characteristics of
the minimum wage.
The income produced by the federal minimum wage will likely keep
families poor. They will seek public
assistance to help meet their basic needs.
Higher incomes would reduce their eligibility for such assistance.
Businesses required to pay a higher minimum wage may reduce
profits, raise prices, lay off workers or adopt a combination of these
measures.
People receiving an increased minimum wage are likely to
spend the added income rather than save it.
That should boost business, though not necessarily the same businesses
paying higher wages.
Increases in the minimum wage come so seldom that it lags behind climbing living costs caused by inflation, constantly eroding the buying power of low-income people.
And we can identify those jobs that are most affected. Many of them are in restaurants among cooks
and wait staff. Women and young people
are more affected than men.
Even if these points may be generally accepted, problems
arise when economists try to measure the impact of each of them.
At what point do higher wages result in fewer people being
hired? That point would show the value
of labor, but it varies by the type of business and even by area.
How much do prices have to increase so that a business will
lose sales? For example, if the price of
a specialty hamburger goes up from, say, $2.75 to $2.85, will people buy fewer
of these burgers?
In fact, the biggest debate when it comes to proposals to
raise the minimum wage is about the effect of increased labor costs on
sales. It may seem logical to assume
that any increase in costs will result in a decrease in sales. But that linkage may not kick in immediately,
and it varies by industry.
Whatever the resolution of these questions, one aspect of
the minimum wage has become more obviously in need of repair. Right now, employers are allowed to pay less
than the federal minimum wage to workers receiving tips – at a wage level that
has not be changed since 1991.
Investigative reporting has found that some tips added into
credit card charges never make their way to the intended recipient. And there’s no sure way of knowing if the tip
income makes up for the loss in wages unless employees report all their cash
tips to the boss.
To end a system in which there are plenty of reasons to
cheat, employees receiving tips should also receive the minimum wage, as is
required in California. That would help retirees
be assured of fair Social Security benefits because of correct employer and
employee contributions.
Federal Reserve policy seeks a two percent annual inflation
rate to provide a cushion to keep a slowdown from throwing the economy into
reverse with a loss of jobs. Shouldn’t
the minimum wage keep pace with this planned inflation?
Given the unresolved economic debate, the minimum wage issue
calls for a political agreement on the correct current rate and then a
permanent inflation adjustment that could finally halt the endless debate.
No comments:
Post a Comment